Tag Archives: trade wars

Trump Facts & Tarriffs

Published / by Stephen

Share This:

First some selected Krugman’ quotes on trump facts and tarrifs, A Ranting Old Guy With Nukes:

1.  Regarding being “factually challenged:”

…you can’t help noticing that his opinions seem a bit, well, factually challenged. No, we aren’t experiencing a huge wave of violent crime carried out by immigrants. No, we don’t give away vast sums in foreign aid. And so on down the list. Basically, what he imagines to be facts are things he thinks he heard somewhere, maybe on Fox News, and can’t be bothered to check.

2.  Regarding tariffs on steel and aluminum, Trumps justification is “national security.”

After all, we can’t be dependent for our aluminum on unstable, hostile foreign powers like … Canada, our principal foreign supplier. (Canada is also our biggest foreign supplier of steel.)

Meanwhile, in the days since Trump’s announcement, he’s tweeted out one falsehood after another. And I don’t mean that he’s been saying things I disagree with; I mean that he’s been saying things that are simply, flatly wrong, even according to the U.S. government itself.

He has, for example, declared that we have large trade deficitswith Canada; actually, according to U.S. numbers, we run a small surplus.

The best argument I have heard against the steel & aluminum tariffs is the following:

  1. Steel and aluminum are not consumer products. They are used in the production of goods — for example beer kegs and automobiles.
  2. Imposing the tariffs raise the production cost of steel and aluminum goods.
  3. The tarrifs may have a minor positive effect on US employment in steel and aluminum production but they will make US steel and aluminum products less competitive.
  4. The result — reduced balance of trade and increased cost of US goods.
  5. If the tariffs result in a trade war things just get worse.

Does this sound like winning? So much for the the wonders of tariffs to increase US production. Hell of an idea Mr. Trump!


Trade-Wars Trump

Published / by Stephen

Share This:

According to Krugman:

“Donald Trump is belligerently ignorant about economics (and many other things). But up to this point that hasn’t mattered much. …

But there was always reason to be concerned about the possibility of crisis — either a crisis created by outside forces, like some kind of financial collapse, or one created by the administration itself. In that case the Fed’s rationality wouldn’t be enough. And it’s starting to look like we have a trade policy crisis on our hands.

“Trump has always had a thing about trade, which he sees the way he sees everything: as a test of power and masculinity. It’s all about who sells more: if we run a trade surplus we win, if we run a trade deficit, we lose”

This is, of course, nonsense. Trade isn’t a zero-sum game: it raises the productivity and wealth of the world economy. To take a not at all random example, it makes a lot of sense to produce aluminum, a process that uses vast amounts of electricity, in countries like Canada, which have abundant hydropower. So the U.S. gains from importing Canadian aluminum, whether or not we run a trade deficit with Canada. (As it happens, we don’t, but that’s pretty much beside the point.) …

So we can’t “win” a trade war. What we can do is start a cycle of tit-for-tat, and when it comes to trade, America — which accounts for 9 percent of world exports and 14 percent of world imports — is by no means a dominant superpower.

A cycle of retaliation would shrink overall world trade, making the world as a whole, America very much included, poorer. Read On.


Delusional Donald

Published / by Stephen

Share This:

“We are going to win so much.”

  • But is lying about the size of the inauguration crowd relative to the crowd size of the Women’s March winning?
  • Is lying by asserting that 3 to 4 million people voted illegality winning?
  • Is starting a trade war with our two biggest export markets (Canada and Mexico) winning?
  • Is lying by asserting that the media is responsible for the dust-up with the intelligence community winning?
  • Is blowing up the deficit by 10 trillion dollars winning?
    Congressional Budget Office.
  • Is excluding all groups but white males and their subservient spouses winning?
  • Is picking a fight with NATO winning?
  • Is lying about the number of jobs (thousands)  created by restarting the pipeline projects winning?
    When finished the number of jobs will be 10 to 20. During construction most of the jobs are high skill, for which there is no shortage, and the number will not be in the thousands.
  • Is gutting regulatory protections from corporate malfeasance winning?

Donald does not get it. It is not about winning. It is about serving all of the people. Is delusional lying an impeachable offense? I believe it is if such lying is used to justify policy and executive actions and orders.